Latest work image
New
Q1 background

Did you choose to come here, or were you always going to?

Q1 object 1 Q1 object 2 Q1 object 3
Q2 background

If your will isn’t free, your beliefs are pre-set. Why trust them?

Q2 object 1 Q2 object 2 Q2 object 3
Q3 background

Do your actions match your creed? If not, what do you really believe?

Q3 object 1 Q3 object 2 Q3 object 3
Core Topics

Quantum mechanics strongly suggests indeterminism (events not fully fixed by prior states). We register that as randomness, but can we, mathematically or in principle, distinguish mere noise from something grander and unknowable, like free will? My stance, akin to Gödel’s lesson that formal systems outstrip their own rules, is that reality contains an irreducible indeterminate component. What instruments score as chance is not brute randomness but the interface where Free Will, ultimately the Free Will of God, acts as needed. The “random” we measure is the measurable surface of purposeful selection.

What differentiates Libertarian Free Will from randomness?

Science succeeds by reduction, explaining effects by their constituents (molecules, cells, fields). That method is superb for emergence from below, but it is not tuned to detect holism from above, where outcomes are selected in light of wider ends. My stance is that wavefunction collapse is such a holistic selection: the hunt for a deeper sub-mechanism simply ends there. If God decides local collapses for global reasons, detection would not come by finer parts but by discerning purpose-shaped patterns in the whole, by understanding the larger aim to which the local outcomes are fitted.

If the scientific method always searches for an underlying principle, how could it ever detect a grander, holistic one?

A merely epiphenomenal consciousness, spectator to fixed neural outputs, would be pointless theatre, or else a sign we inhabit a staged experience (which itself points beyond us). I hold that we do have free will, and that it is holistic in kind, akin, by analogy, to God’s: a reason-responsive capacity to select among genuine alternatives. Determinist readings (e.g., Sapolsky) find no bottom-up “free-will particle,” but that is the wrong place to look; agency is not a neural residue but a top-down power of the conscious agent to act for reasons.

If consciousness only observes thoughts and options, but no free will exists to act upon them, what purpose could consciousness have?

We all wrestle with the old donkey (C. S. Lewis), yet our deeds disclose our creed. James asks whether faith without works can save; our ledger of time and money answers daily. To purchase a house without vocation—no call, no mission, no charge from God—is not neutral: it is a massive act of self-investment. It ties up capital for private comfort and status, locks future income into self-maintenance, and binds attention to my walls, my equity, my horizon. If Christ has bought our freedom, stewardship means directing our time and money to His ends, not our comfort; otherwise our calendars and accounts become a liturgy of self.

If you believe in God and accept He has bought your freedom, how can you still invest so much time and money in yourself without His instruction?

Works & Research
Resources
Argument Studio
build and download your arguments
Open
Barriers-to-Gospel Analyzer
provides you with clues as to what is in the way for a person to believe
Open
About
Stefan Stalder portrait
Stefan Stalder
Father • Engineer • Systems thinker

I’m a mechanical engineer (ETH MSc) with a sustained focus on quantum physics and the intersection between science and faith. I’m also an enthusiastic hobby-philosopher. I live in and lead a community house; when I’m not at work I’m reading, philosophizing, and sketching ideas to better the world. Above all, I’m a husband and father of two.

Contact
I’ll reply by email. Your details are used for contact only.